Manifest Density

Half of America Wants to Burn Down the Two-Party System, and the Other Half Is Too Broke to Care

By Tammy-Jo Pritchett · August 10, 2026
Opinion

I’ve got four kids, a group chat that never stops buzzing, and exactly zero patience left for anyone in Washington who tells me the system is working just fine. So when I saw this new poll that NPR got their hands on, I did what any mom who’s been burned before does. I read the whole thing myself.

Here’s what I found. A poll commissioned by a group called Fix Our House and a think tank called New America surveyed 1,000 voters, and half of them said yes, let’s blow up the way we elect Congress. Not tweak it. Not “reform” it with some 900-page bill nobody reads. Replace winner-take-all House elections with proportional representation, where seats actually match how people vote. A quarter said no. A third said they weren’t sure. And here’s the part that made me sit up straight: six in ten Trump voters who had an opinion said they back it too.

This isn’t a lefty thing. This isn’t a righty thing. This is a mom-at-the-grocery-store-thing. We are all sick of choosing between two options we didn’t pick and nobody asked us about.

Gallup says 45% of adults now call themselves independents. That’s up from about a third twenty years ago. More than half of Gen Z and Millennials say they don’t belong to either party. And Pew found nearly 70% of people wish there were more parties to choose from. Seventy percent! You can’t get 70% of Americans to agree on pizza toppings, but they agree on this: the menu has two items, both are spoiled, and the kitchen closed an hour ago.

Renée Johnson from Stockton Springs, ME, USA (BY-SA) via wikimedia
Olympia Snowe

Now let me tell you what the “experts” are finally admitting. Trust in the federal government was 73% in 1958. Last year it was 19%. Congressional approval sits between 10 and 20%. We have one of the lowest voter turnout rates in the entire developed world, barely over 50%. The Freakonomics people put it perfectly: the real question isn’t why so few Americans vote. It’s why so many still bother.

I’ll tell you why. Because we’re mothers and fathers and we keep showing up hoping this time will be different. And every time, it isn’t.

Here’s what really got me. Only 2% of people in this poll could even name proportional representation when asked. Two percent! But when pollsters explained how it works, support came from everywhere. Left, right, young, old. Because when you strip away the jargon and the think-tank labels, the idea is just common sense: if 20% of the country votes for something, they should get 20% of the seats. Not zero. Not “better luck next time, try gerrymandering harder.”

Proportional representation is already the most common election system in democracies around the world. We’re the ones still doing it the old way. As Dustin Wahl from Fix Our House put it, the only reason we don’t use it is because it didn’t exist anywhere when the country was founded, and we just never changed. We update our phones every two years but we’re running our democracy on a 1787 operating system and wondering why it keeps crashing.

Carol M. Highsmith (Public domain) via Wikimedia Commons
Washington

There are bills in Congress right now, all Democratic co-sponsors, that would study or move us toward this system. The poll also found 54% support expanding the House by 150 seats. And Wahl said something that made me laugh out loud: any bill that doesn’t expand the House is “politically dead in the water” because you can’t ask members of Congress to vote themselves out of a job. Of course you can’t. They’ll vote to send your kids to war before they vote to lose their own desk.

Olympia Snowe, a Republican senator from Maine who served 34 years in Congress, quit because she said the polarization is the worst it’s been since Reconstruction. In 1982, there were 58 senators who sat between the most conservative Democrat and the most liberal Republican. Today there are zero. In the House, it went from 344 to four. Four people in the entire House of Representatives who don’t fit neatly into a red or blue box. I have more political diversity in my minivan on the way to soccer practice.

So here’s my question for the manager. Actually, I’ve got several. Why are we still pretending this two-party thing is sacred? Why do 500 democracy experts have to write a letter to Congress begging them to consider a system the rest of the world already uses? And why does it take a poll to tell Washington something every parent in America already knows at the dinner table?

We’re not confused. We’re not uneducated. We’re not “easily manipulated,” no matter what the comment section wants to tell itself. We’re tired. We’re done choosing between the lesser of two evils. And if 50% of the country is ready for something new before anyone even explained what it was, imagine what happens when people actually understand the choice.

The two-party system isn’t protecting democracy. It’s the thing democracy needs protecting from.

Editor’s note. While the author rightly identifies our shared exhaustion with the current setup, she conveniently forgets to mention that the 'fix' she proposes would likely require the very same party to pass a law that the party currently cannot pass, turning her frustration into a permanent loop of gridlock. (W.K.)